Color
has been defined in numerous ways. In Antiquity, the Greeks
saw the color spectrum as a system from light to dark limited
to four colors: Pliny listed white (light), black (dark) and
the intermediate colors yellow and red.(1) This does not indicate
that the Greeks did not recognize or use other colors. Their
system of classification was focused on brightness and saturation,
two of the three-dimensional aspects under which we currently
classify color (the last being hue--what we usually mean colloquially
by color)(2).
During
the seventeenth century, the modern primary colors--yellow,
red and blue--became accepted (3) and, in 1704, Isaac Newton
(1642-1727) first published Opticks, a seminal work
in the history of color. Although
he was not the first to break up a solar ray through a prism,
he did identify the rainbow's irreducible hues in term of
their slightly different angles of refraction.(4) Following
in his footsteps, many physicist and chemists would dwell
on color theories and on ways to map the color spectrum. Most
researchers were concerned by theory rather than practice
and, routinely, academic works were rejected by dyers.(5)
The art
of the dyer involved numerous activities and a breath of knowledge
that extended beyond the eighteenth-century chemist's theories. Industrial
historian Agustí Nieto-Galan reminds us that the technology
of dyeing embraced vegetable, animal and mineral sources of
colors in the forms of gums, resins, oils, salts, alkalis,
acids and oxides, and operations such as washing, bleaching,
degreasing, mordanting and dyeing (6) that were not yet fully
understood by chemists. However,
when Diderot's (1713-1784) Encyclopédie was
first published in 1751, dying was classified as a specific
branch of chemistry.(7) Although
the dyer's art was complex and reserved for the initiated
few, Diderot's efforts to classify human knowledge to make
sense of the world--a pivotal aspect of the Enlightenment--included
a field that, although rooted in chemistry and natural history,
could only describe results and not the reason behind them.
From the
1770s to the 1820s, the world underwent many revolutions,
one of which took place in the field of chemistry. Before
this time, barely any of the chemical elements were known
and the scientific community spoke an antiquated language
few would understand today.(8) By
the 1820s, this was no longer true. Before
his untimely death at the guillotine, Antoine Laurent de Lavoisier
(1743-1794) listed thirty elements in his 1789 periodical
table (9) and figured out that carbon was the common factor
among natural products, the cornerstone of organic chemistry.(10) The
period witnessed a scientific explosion and, by 1848, twenty-nine
more elements were added (11) causing the dyer's trade to
change drastically.
Among
the forgotten triumphs of chemistry and its application to
fashion in the late eighteenth century was 1774 discovery
of chlorine by Carl Wilhelm Scheele (1742-1786) and the demonstration
of its bleaching power by Claude-Louis Berthollet's (1748-1822)
in the 1780s.(12) In
an era where Neo-Classicism's misconception of Greek fashions
fostered a rage for sheer white cottons, the large-scale application
of this chemical process paved the way for the Age of Nudity
and facilitated the development of calico-printing. Other
research included the 1770s discoveries of two new sources
of yellow: the first artificial organic dye, Peter Woulfe's
picrid acid, obtained with the action of nitric acid on indigo,
(13) and Edward Bancroft's quercitron, a vegetable dye discovered
in North America.(14) Although
picric acid would not be manufactured until the 1840s, quercitron,
applied with a mordant, was more stable and cheaper than weld
and other sources of yellow such as old fustic, saffron or
turmeric and thus became extremely popular in the late eighteenth
century.(15)
_______
(1) Philip Ball, Bright Earth: Art and the Invention of
Color (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2001), 15.
(2) Ibid., 47.
(3) Ibid., 37.
(4) Ibid., 25.
(5) Agustí Nieto-Galan, Colouring Textiles: A History
of Natural Dyestuffs in Industrial Europe (Dordrecht,
Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001), 86.
(6)
Ibid., xviii.
(7) Ibid., 1.
(8) Ball, 147.
(9) Ibid.
(10) Ibid., 216.
(11) Ibid., 147.
(12) Ibid., 207-208.
(13) Alan Dronsfield and John Edmonds, Historic Dyes Series
(Little Chalfont, UK: J. Edmonds, 2001), no. 6, The Transition
from Natural to Synthetic Dyes, 1856-1920, 25.
(14) Nieto-Galan, 21.
(15) Ibid., 22.